AI Is Hitting a Compute Wall – Can the Human Brain Show the Way Forward?

For years, the race in artificial intelligence has been defined by one word: scale. Bigger models, more parameters, larger datasets. Every major leap—whether it was OpenAI’s GPT-4, Google’s Gemini, or DeepMind’s latest advancements—has relied on throwing more computational power at the problem. But we are now approaching a fundamental limit: compute and power constraints are becoming the bottleneck. The cost to train, run, and deploy these models is skyrocketing, making further progress unsustainable without radical new efficiencies.

But there’s already a model of extreme efficiency staring us in the face: the human brain. Despite running on just about 20 watts—less energy than a dim lightbulb—it outperforms even the largest AI systems in many areas. Why? Because evolution has spent millions of years refining human cognition to optimize for energy efficiency while maintaining high-level intelligence. If AI is to continue progressing, it must undergo a similar transformation—not just getting bigger, but getting smarter about how it uses its resources.

The Cost of Scale: AI’s Compute and Power Crisis

Modern AI is incredibly powerful but also astonishingly inefficient. Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 require massive GPUs and cloud infrastructure to function. The larger the context window—the amount of text a model can process at once—the more expensive and power-hungry the computation.

The core issue is that today’s dominant AI architecture, the transformer, uses an “attention” mechanism that scales quadratically with the length of input. Doubling the input text quadruples the memory and compute required. This is why extending context windows beyond a certain point becomes prohibitively expensive. A 100,000-token context—while theoretically possible—demands so much memory that it’s impractical for most real-world applications.

On top of that, training AI models is becoming environmentally and economically unsustainable. GPT-3 alone required thousands of GPUs running for weeks, consuming energy equivalent to the annual usage of small towns. If this trend continues, only the biggest tech companies will be able to afford state-of-the-art AI, creating an AI divide where only the wealthiest organizations can benefit.

Clearly, brute-force scaling is hitting a wall. The future of AI depends not on raw horsepower, but on efficiency.

The Human Brain: A Masterclass in Efficiency

The human brain is a marvel of energy optimization. Despite having billions of neurons, it consumes less energy than a gaming laptop. This efficiency is the result of evolutionary pressures that forced the brain to optimize every aspect of information processing.

Three key principles stand out:

  1. Chunking and Hierarchical Memory: Our brains don’t store every detail of an experience. Instead, we compress information into meaningful chunks. You don’t remember every word in a conversation—you remember the key ideas. AI could mimic this by dynamically summarizing and abstracting information rather than storing everything in a massive attention matrix.
  2. Associative Memory and Retrieval: Humans retrieve memories through association, not brute force scanning. If you hear a familiar song, it can trigger a cascade of related memories. AI models, on the other hand, struggle with recall because they don’t have a truly associative memory system. Future AI architectures should incorporate content-addressable memory, where information is retrieved based on similarity rather than linear sequence position.
  3. Modular and Specialized Processing: The brain isn’t one giant monolithic model—it’s a collection of specialized subsystems. The visual cortex processes sight, the auditory cortex handles sound, and higher-level reasoning is distributed across different brain regions. AI is just beginning to explore this idea with Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, where different sub-models specialize in different tasks. This dramatically reduces the amount of computation needed for any given input, mirroring how the brain only activates necessary neurons for a task rather than processing everything at once.

Brain-Inspired AI: More Power, Less Compute

If AI is to keep advancing, it needs to move beyond brute force and start learning from the efficiency tricks of the brain. Some promising directions include:

  • Sparse Attention and Selective Focus: Just as our brains selectively focus on key details while ignoring irrelevant information, AI should implement adaptive attention mechanisms that dynamically allocate computational resources based on importance rather than processing everything equally.
  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Instead of cramming everything into a model’s immediate memory, AI can fetch relevant information on demand, similar to how humans use reference materials rather than memorizing entire encyclopedias.
  • Memory-Optimized AI: Future models could incorporate long-term memory that isn’t just a long context window, but a structured, hierarchical memory system that retrieves relevant information based on context—like how humans recall facts when they become relevant, not all at once.
  • Neuromorphic Computing: AI hardware could shift toward architectures that mimic the brain’s spiking neural networks, which process information through energy-efficient pulses rather than continuous activation. This could reduce power consumption by orders of magnitude.

The Future: Evolutionary Pressure on AI

Just as human evolution favored energy-efficient brains, economic and environmental pressures will push AI toward leaner, smarter architectures. Companies and researchers who invest in efficiency will be able to scale AI more sustainably, deploy it in more applications, and achieve more with less. In the long run, efficiency isn’t just about cost savings—it’s about unlocking new capabilities that brute-force AI could never achieve.

The shift from “bigger is better” to “smarter is better” is already happening. Models like DeepSeek, which use Mixture-of-Experts to activate only the parameters needed per query, are proving that modular AI can rival traditional monolithic models at a fraction of the cost. Innovations in memory compression, dynamic routing, and energy-efficient processing will define the next generation of AI systems.

AI has learned a lot from neuroscience over the years, from neural networks to reinforcement learning. But if it truly wants to evolve past its current limitations, it must embrace the most important lesson of all: intelligence isn’t just about capability—it’s about efficiency.

Note: While the general ideas about AI facing the same selective pressures as the mammalian brain towards energy efficiency and the need to look at things like associative memory as a way to be more efficient are my ideas, I also used this as a test case for ChatGPT’s Deep Research tool. So, fair warning: ChatGPT Deep Research Contributed to this Blog Post.

References:

  1. IBM Research Blog (2024). What’s an LLM context window and why is it getting larger? IBM Research
  2. Wang, X. et al. (2024). Beyond the Limits: A Survey of Techniques to Extend the Context Length in Large Language Models. arXiv
  3. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review
  4. Yassa, M. A., & Stark, C. E. (2011). Pattern separation in the hippocampus. Trends in Neurosciences
  5. Bergmann, D. (2024). What is mixture of experts? IBM AI Blog
  6. Hanbury, P., Wang, J., Brick, P., & Cannarsi, A. (2025). DeepSeek: A Game Changer in AI Efficiency? Bain & Company Brief
  7. Lewis, P. et al. (2020). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP. NeurIPS Proceedings
  8. Beltagy, I., Peters, M. E., & Cohan, A. (2020). Longformer: The long-document transformer. arXiv
  9. IBM (2023). History of Artificial Intelligence. IBM Think
  10. Dobs, K., Martinez, J., Kell, A. J., & Kanwisher, N. (2022). Brain-like functional specialization emerges spontaneously in deep neural networks. Science Advances
  11. Krotov, D. (2024). In search of AI algorithms that mimic the brain. IBM Research Blog

I am a former software engineer turned lawyer, practicing patent, trademark, copyright, and technology law in New Orleans, Louisiana with Carver Darden. You can read more about me, or find out how to contact me. You can also follow me (@NolaPatent) on Twitter or Linked In. All content on this website is subject to disclaimer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*